PDA

View Full Version : Xianghua's Sword of No Name vs. foundations and assets



guitalex2010
08-14-2010, 12:25 PM
If Xianghua's Sword of No Name's F ability adds a 4 difficulty or less foundation or asset to the card pool, will the added asset or foundation move to the staging area at the end of the turn?

Say I used its form by destroying it, then decided to not get rid of it and put IT back on the card pool. Will it come back down? I know it's an illogical thing to do but I'm curious.

SMazzurco
08-14-2010, 01:02 PM
when clearing the card pool, according to AGR

9.6 "Any asset will be moved to the staging area"
9.7 "Any Foundations that was played will be moved to the staging area"

so, and i am NOT in agreement here, according to the AGR, if you put IT (the asset) back in the cardpool, it would drop down. A foundation would not, because it was not played.

edit: btw, 9.3 clears blocks, so if you block with an asset, that is why it does not drop down to staging area.

guitalex2010
08-16-2010, 12:30 PM
Wow, weird.

So... it could put an asset in the card pool, then have it move to the staging area, but not with foundations? Extreme jank.

SMazzurco
08-16-2010, 12:40 PM
I am waiting for an overrule on this.

9.6 of the AGR is just poorly worded IMO

rAn
08-16-2010, 12:51 PM
Yea..it should just be worded the way 9.7 is. I'm sure it'll be changed.

RockStar
08-16-2010, 01:32 PM
but until it is...go crazy!!

SMazzurco
08-16-2010, 01:58 PM
Also i will point out it does NOT state it has to be an asset you could normally play. So go ahead and grab your favorite 4-diff or less asset!

guitalex2010
08-16-2010, 02:18 PM
None of X's stuff, even HERSELF states "that you could normally play"... it just happens.

I still want a deck of only throws and off-resource foundations...

SMazzurco
08-16-2010, 02:31 PM
None of X's stuff, even HERSELF states "that you could normally play"... it just happens.

I still want a deck of only throws and off-resource foundations...

getting off topic but with all her combo and weapon attacks paid to protect is fun in her

Tagrineth
08-17-2010, 02:39 AM
Yup, she's intended to be THAT janky, because she's so easy to stop and can easily get incredibly bad dead hands full of literally unplayable cards. It's a calculated risk. That and 7/18, lol.

SMazzurco
08-17-2010, 07:24 AM
i like her. Any character who can deal over 40 dmg turn 1 is ok in my book

guitalex2010
08-17-2010, 10:45 AM
i like her. Any character who can deal over 40 dmg turn 1 is ok in my bookThis. And since I hate one-word responses, here are some more words. Catfish, basketball, underwear.

KodiakZero
08-17-2010, 03:20 PM
This. And since I hate one-word responses, here are some more words. Catfish, basketball, underwear.

That made me lul